Revisiting Will Smith’s slap and what it means to protect a loved one


It took lower than a nanosecond earlier than The Slap was seen around the globe. It took a bit of longer – about two weeks – earlier than the Academy of Movement Image Arts and Sciences determined to ban Will Smith from showing at one other Oscar awards ceremony.

However lacking from the frenzy that consumed social media and mainstream channels about that notorious evening has been a constructive dialogue concerning the concept of safety – and the way race performs a job within the perceptions of each the protectors and the protected.

As a scholar of African American tradition, philosophy and historical past, I consider the The Slap invitations us to reassess the ability of relations between companions and spouses. It additionally highlights the precarious lives of Black women and girls on account of failures to guard them.

The character of safety

Most individuals agree that “safety” means protection of somebody or one thing from hurt.

The best way dad and mom attempt to defend their kids in opposition to hurt is a sort of safety.

So too are actions on the coronary heart of the origins of American street gangs, fashioned initially by individuals whom the state deserted and left defenseless from hurt’s means. This, admittedly, is a facet of American historical past typically forgotten or unfamiliar to most people.

“To gangbang (v.),” writes Harvard College’s Danielle Allen, is “to guard ‘your’ turf and use your energy to prey on the susceptible with a view to make a revenue and assist these ‘whom you name your individual.'”

The Slap represents a 3rd style of safety: males declaring themselves their partner’s protector.

Iris Marion Young, the late feminist thinker and scholar of democracy, wrote a provocative essay titled “The Logic of Masculinist Protection.”

Highly effective males, she wrote, typically justify their expressions of all-encompassing, paternalistic authority as acts to guard ladies and children from predators that, if left unchecked, would belittle, disrespect and, at worst, destroy these kids and girls.

Younger maintained {that a} male protector presents himself to be a “brave, accountable, and virtuous man.”

“The ‘good’ man,” she continued, “is one who retains vigilant watch over the security of his household and readily dangers himself within the face of threats from the skin with a view to shield the subordinate members of his family.”

This logic collapses, although, when the protector’s imaginative and prescient of the household and its wants would not mirror actuality.

A calling from God

Is chivalry useless or not value saving?

Clearly, Smith believes that chivalry just isn’t useless and is value saving. Born within the medieval period that ended within the 1400s, chivalry is the romanticized dream of a knight in shining armor rescuing a damsel in misery.

The damsel on this case was Jada Pinkett Smith, and jokes about her practically bald head by Chris Rock weren’t humorous however as a substitute tone-deaf, given her wrestle with alopecia. The situation is understood to trigger hair loss.

A clue as to why Will Smith selected openhanded violence in opposition to Chris Rock within the title of his spouse lies within the opening to his Oscars finest actor acceptance speech.

Within the movie “King Richard,” Smith performed the position of Richard Williams, the daddy {of professional} tennis stars Venus and Serena Williams.

[Like what you’ve read? Want more? Sign up for The Conversation’s daily newsletter.]

Smith stated that Williams typically needed to defend his daughters – as Smith defined he needed to do through the course of taking pictures the film to guard his co-stars: Aunjanue Ellis, Saniyya Sidney and Demi Singleton.

Smith then described a calling from God.

“On this time in my life,” Smith defined, “on this second, I’m overwhelmed by what God is asking on me to do and be on this world … I am being known as on in my life to like individuals and to guard individuals and to be a river to my individuals.”

Who watches the protector?

Within the Smith case, it seems that people who find themselves objects of safety do not at all times have a say within the actions of their declared protectors.

When Smith heard Rock’s supposed joke, he checked out his spouse, walked up and delivered The Slap, sat again down after which twice screamed an obscenity at Rock.

Certainly, one’s position as a protector does not imply one’s intentions are pushed by love, chivalry or assist.

For my part, what Jada wanted most from her husband – as do all people – was assist and love, not misguided male safety enacted underneath the guise of affection.

Writer: Neil Roberts – Professor of Africana Research and Political Science, Williams Faculty The Conversation


Back To Top